This Is the Reason People Are Feeling Sick Around the Vaxxinated. They Are Emitting Radiation!!

By Australian National Review

Original source:

Kyrie Irving Says Decision To Remain Unvaxxinated Is ‘About Being True to What Feels Good for Me’

By London Times

Kyrie Irving said Wednesday night he still hopes to return and play for the Brooklyn Nets but that “this is about my life and what I am choosing to do,” as he explained his decision to not receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Irving, speaking on Instagram Live, said he is neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine and that he fully understands the ramifications of his decision.

“The financial consequences, I know I do not want to even do that,” Irving said. “But it is reality that in order to be in New York City, in order to be on a team, I have to be vaccinated. I chose to be unvaccinated, and that was my choice, and I would ask you all to just respect that choice.

“I am going to just continue to stay in shape, be ready to play, be ready to rock out with my teammates and just be part of this whole thing. This is not a political thing; this is not about the NBA, not about any organization. This is about my life and what I am choosing to do.”

Irving spoke out on social media one day after the Nets decided to not allow their starting point guard to practice or play with them at all until he complies with New York City’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Irving made it clear that he is not upset with the Nets organization, his teammates or the NBA, and he said he was not trying to make a political statement. He repeatedly said he respects doctors who continue to try to keep people safe and those who are vaccinated, while also respecting those who aren’t vaccinated and “are being mandated to do this and are losing their livelihood.”

Nets general manager Sean Marks said Tuesday that the decision to not let Irving join the team until he gets at least one vaccine shot was ultimately made by him and team owner Joe Tsai. Marks also said Irving will lose only the money he was due to play in home games, which he is not allowed to do under New York City’s mandate.

If Irving misses every game in Brooklyn this season (including preseason games), along with the two regular-season games against the Knicks at Madison Square Garden, he could lose over $17 million, according to ESPN’s Bobby Marks and Tim Bontemps. Irving also is eligible to sign a four-year, $187 million extension with Brooklyn.

“You got to make these convictions yourself,” said Irving, who had not spoken publicly since Sept. 27, when he had to talk to reporters via videoconference call because he couldn’t join his teammates for media day due to New York City’s mandate. “‘Yo, you are going to lose out on money; you are going to lose out on this.’ So what. It is not about the money, baby. It is about choosing what is best for you.

“You really think I want to lose money? You think I really want to give up on my dream to go after a championship? You think I really just want to give up my job? Think I really just want to sit at home and not go after the things with my teammates that I have been able to grow with, to learn with, to learn that it takes sacrifice in this space. … You think I want to give up my livelihood because of a mandate, because I don’t have accommodations, because I am unvaccinated? Come on.”

Irving said he is “still uncertain about a lot of things, and that is OK.”

“This is my life,” Irving said. “I get to do whatever I want with this, this is one body that I get here. And you are telling me what to do with my body. … This has everything to do with what is going on in our world. And I am being grouped into something that is bigger than just the game of basketball.”

Irving ended his talk on Instagram Live by saying he is not going to end his career like this.

“Nobody is hijacking this voice,” Irving said. “See if they play this on their TV channels and if they play this actual truth somewhere before you start talking about me and what I am doing with my life. And no, I am not retiring. And no, I am not going and leaving this game like this. There is still so much more work to do.”

Original Source:

France’s Senate Rejects BS 19 Vaxx Mandates With Overwhelming Majority: 262 Senators Voted Against and 64 Senators Shamefully Voted in Favour

By European Times

Bravo! France’s Senate rejects Covid vaccine mandates with overwhelming majority: 262 Senators voted against and 64 Senators shamefully voted in favour.


Here’s what others had to say:

James Arthur
In France, for all practical purposes, vaccination is already mandatory because of the vaccine passport

ian alexander
Isn’t acquired immunity and/or negative test as good as the vac passport in France?

Féliciano BASTOS
They just refused a compulsory vaccination project but will extend the vaccinal passport until July and plans to establish it in common law

Sorry, but at the same time they extended “health” pass til 07.31.22.
I’m not sure they want to impose mandates yet, cause that would make them responsible.
Also we have a presidential election in april 2022.

Lau Fa
Trust me, we are far from being free in France.

Original Source:

How We Must Respond to the Coronavirus Pandemic | Bill Gates

By Australian National Review

Philanthropist and Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates offers insights into the COVID-19 pandemic, discussing why testing and self-isolation are essential, which medical advancements show promise and what it will take for the world to endure this crisis. (This virtual conversation is part of the TED Connects series, hosted by head of TED Chris Anderson and current affairs curator Whitney Pennington Rodgers.

Here’s what others had to say:

Theseustoo Astyages
Why is Bill Gates being interviewed about COVID 19? What are his qualifications in immunology, virology and/or epidemiology? (And another, side question: Does he have any vested interests that he should be declaring, eg. lots of shares in drug or vaccine-producing companies? Or other medical equipment companies?)

Ab Zed
A “computer man” is telling how to fight viruses in “human.” This man is really sick!

Bill’s house sure has a lot of windows

Where did Bill get his medical degree from?

Who else here after the Bill Gates’ 2015 talk “We’re not ready for the next epidemic.”

if he doesnt say anything about removing junkfoods and cigarettes, this is all bullshit!

Barry Bradley
When a software tycoon starts playing God on medical matters !!!

He has an eerie snigger when talking about such a serious subject!

Huw Rees
Hey, why did you edit out the bit where he says people should need digital proof of immunity before being allowed to travel? Don’t you agree with that?

Lee E Tibbetts
I am suprised that Mr Gates didn’t mention Event 201, which his foundation is sponsored in October 2019, who’s lessons learned predicted the exact problems we are experiencing now.

Original Source:

Teen Deaths Up to 125% Higher Than the 5-Year-Average Since They Started To Be Given the Cov19 Vaxx According to Official ONS Data

By London Times

An investigation of official ONS data has revealed that since the Covid-19 vaccine was offered and administered to teenagers in England and Wales there has been a significant rise in deaths among teens against the five-year-average with some weeks seeing an increase as high as 125%.

For children 12 to 15 years of age, the extremely short and small Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events which left the children unable to perform daily activities, during the two-month observation period to be 10.7%, or 1 in 9, in the vaccinated group and 1.9% in the unvaccinated group.

Consequently, children who received the vaccine had nearly six times the risk of a severe adverse event occurring in the two-month observation period compared to children who did not receive the vaccine. In addition, the incidence of Covid-19 in the unvaccinated group was 1.6%, therefore, there were almost seven times more severe adverse events observed in the vaccinated group than there were Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated group.

The above data is partly why the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), the independent committee that advises the UK Government on Vaccinations, were unable to recommend that all children over the age of 12 should be offered a Covid-19 vaccine. Citing that “the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds at this time.”

In their statement to the Government released on September 3rd the JCVI stated that “for the vast majority of children, SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and will resolve without treatment. Of the very few children aged 12 to 15 years who require hospitalisation, the majority have underlying health conditions.”

However, the UK Government were not happy with this decision, despite the ‘Health Protection (Vaccination) Regulations 2009’ placing a duty on the Secretary of State for Health in England to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the recommendations of JCVI are implemented.

So they called upon the four Chief Medical Officer’s for the United Kingdom, which includes Professor Chris Whitty the CMO for England, to reassess the data on vaccinating children and offer their own advise to the Government. As expected Chris Whitty and his colleagues overruled the JCVI citing on September 13th that the ““the most important [decision on recommending vaccination] in this age group was impact on education”.

This raised some serious questions –

  1. Did Covid-19 close the schools? The answer is of course no. Schools were closed because of Government policy.
  2. Should a person take a medical treatment so that they are able to partake in society or education? The answer is course no. A person should only ever take a medical treatment for a medical reason, in the case of the Covid-19 vaccine that reason should be to prevent infection and transmission; which it does not do, or prevent illness; which it will not do as children are at such low risk of suffering serious illness due to Covid-19.

The decision by Chris Whitty and his fellow Chief Medical Officers to advise the Government that the Covid-19 vaccines should be offered to children was not a decision based on science, it was instead a decision based on politics.

But have there been any consequences of the decision to overrule the JCVI, whose decisions should be obeyed by law as far as is reasonably practicable?

Well, the latest data from the new UK Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England shows that up to the day of Chris Whitty’s decision to offer the Covid-19 injection to all children, approximately 6% of children aged between 12 and 15 had received the vaccine. This is because the JCVI had previously recommended that all children over 12 deemed to be “vulnerable” should be offered the jab.

However, since Whitty’s decision on September 13th the UKHSA data shows that only a further 3% of children have received a Covid-19 injection, suggesting most parents have finally said “enough is enough”, and are not going to allow the state to experiment on their children.

There are approximately 3 million children aged between 12 and 15 in the UK, which means approximately 180,000 children deemed vulnerable had received the jab up to September 13th, whilst a further 90,000 children have received the jab since September 13th.

Which is all the more reason to be concerned by the latest data available from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), considering there has been such low uptake of the jab among this age group so far.

The ONS responded to a Freedom Of Information request asking for statistics the five-year-average (2015 – 2019) of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’ by age-group. The document can be downloaded, and accessed on the ONS website.

The data shows that the five-year-average number of deaths among 10-14 year-olds in week 38 was 6, and was 6 deaths again for week 39.

However, the 2021 edition of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’, which can be downloaded, and accessed on the ONS website, shows that in the week ending 24th September 2021 (Week 38), a total of 8 children aged between 10 and 14 lost their lives, whilst in the week ending 1st October 2021 (Week 39), a total of 7 children lost their lives.

This means that since healthy children over the age 12 started being given the Covid-19 injection, deaths have increased by 25% against the five-year-average, but this is of course a very small amount of data so it is too early to come to a solid conclusion, but it’s important to publicise this data as it happens, not retrospectively once the damage is done.

However, data available from the ONS on deaths among teenagers aged between 15 and 19 shows does show real cause for concern and there is a substantial amount of it.

We compiled the following table of ONS figures taken from the 5-year-average ONS ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’ report which can be downloaded, and the 2021 ONS ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’ report which can be downloaded.

The above data is taken from the week ending 25th June 2021 and the week ending 1st October 2021. The week ending 25th June was chosen due to an obvious uptick in vaccination of the 15-19 year0old age group from this date.

As you can see from the above, the highest increase in deaths came in the week 35 which saw a 67% increase on the number of deaths in teens against the five-year-average, this represented a 60% increase in male teen deaths, and a 75% increase in female teen deaths.

The largest increase in male teen deaths came in the week 26 which saw a 90% increase in male teen deaths, but a decrease in female teen deaths, equating to -45% against the five-year-average.

We were also able to discover from the table above that deaths in male teens have seen a significant increase against the five-year-average in 11 of the 15 weeks since a sizeable amount of teens started getting the Covid-19 vaccine.

Whereas deaths among female teens only saw an increase against the five-year-average in 6 of the 15 weeks since this age group began receiving the Covid-19 vaccine. A further 3 of the 15 weeks saw a 0% increase in deaths against the five-year-average, whilst 6 of the 20 weeks actually saw a percentage decrease in the number of deaths registered compared to the previous year. It is however concerning to note that week 34 saw a 125% increase in female teen deaths compared to the five-year-average.

There is also concerning evidence that could explain why there is such a large increase in deaths of male teens against the five-year-average since they started to be given the Covid-19 vaccine.

The Medicine and Healthcare product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have openly admitted that they suspect myocarditis and pericarditis are potential side effects of the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines, especially among young males. A suspicion that has been strong enough for the UK Medicine Regulator to officially add warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis to the safety labels of the Covid-19 vaccines.

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, whereas pericarditis is inflammation of the protective sacs surrounding the heart. Both are extremely serious conditions due to the vital role the heart plays in keeping a person alive, and the fact that the heart muscle cannot regenerate. Serious myocarditis can lead to cardiac arrest and knock years off a persons life.

As you can see above, the MHRA revised the safety lavels for bother the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 injections on the 25th June, the end of the first week in which a sudden uptick in vaccinations of teens began, and the end of the first week that an increase in teen deaths against the five-year-average was recorded. But it was also around the same date daily calls requesting an ambulance due to cardiac arrest also started to rise significantly against the expected levels.

The above graph is taken from the ‘Ambulance Syndromic Surveillance System Bulletin (England) 2021 Week 39’ published by the UK Health Security Agency on the 7th October, and it shows that daily calls made due to cardiac arrest have been significantly higher than the baseline since June 2021.

This is the first time the UK Health Security Agency has published this data, as it was previously published by Public Health England, and as we have found with other data they have conveniently left out important markers that allow us to make more sense of the data, so we’ve included a previous graph on calls requesting an ambulance due to cardiac arrest up to the 26th September 2021, which was published by PHE.

PHE included the data on expected pre-Covid-19 levels as represented by the orange dotted line, and as you can see they have calls due to cardiac arrest have been miles above the expected levels since June 2021. The fact that the UK Health Security Agency have chosen to ommit this data proves that they have something to hide and suggests they are not going to be very open and honest with the public in the future.

The fact that 999 calls requesting an ambulance due to cardiac arrest, and the number of deaths among teenage boys have both seen a significant increase against the expected level, alongside the fact that myocarditis is a confirmed side effect of the Covid-19 vaccines; especially among younger males, is extremely concerning when it can be clearly seen that the increases correlate with the start of a significant amount of teens receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.

The data is there now for the authorities to see, a 20.3% increase in teen deaths, a 27% increase in male teen deaths, and a 9% increase in female teen deaths, as well as a 25% increase in deaths of children against the five-year-average since they started to be given the Covid-19 vaccine. They must investigate this and cease the roll-out of this experimental injection to children immediately.

Original source:

More Evidence ‘They’ Want You Dead

By European Times

Back in the mid 1970s I wrote that doctors could no longer call themselves members of a profession since they took their orders from an industry – the drug industry.

The medical establishment sold out decades ago, and over the years I have been staggered by the way the BMA and the GMC have betrayed patients, and the way doctors have repeatedly allowed themselves to be tricked, cajoled and bought. Most now live in a cesspit of corruption where their professional lives are controlled by the most evil industry in the world.

Most cases of type 11 diabetes could be treated with diet rather than pills. Heart disease is treated with drugs or surgery when it has been proved beyond doubt that it can be treated successfully with diet, relaxation and exercise. Doctors have repeatedly misdiagnosed dementia. And they have prescribed huge quantities of dangerously addictive benzodiazepine drugs.

All that was bad enough.

But things have got consistently worse during the last year and a half. Every day seems to bring new examples of professional lunacy.

Unbelievably, and unforgivably, doctors writing in the British Medical Journal have called for the medical profession to do less screening of patients and to cut back on prescribing treatment – `to help combat climate change’. Doctors have called for global warming concerns to be put above patients’ interests.

Let’s get this straight: the medical establishment wants to cut back on diagnosing cancer early in order to save Big Ben from disappearing under 100 foot waves a week on Wednesday. This may be childish, pseudoscientific gibberish but it is also terrifyingly wicked.

`The climate emergency is the true health crisis of our time,’ is the message from the medical establishment who appear to have had their brains removed and replaced with those of 12-year-old girls.

The members of the medical establishment who believe this should all be certified insane and put into a coma to protect the public from their deranged utterings.

There is not one jot of real scientific evidence for the myth of climate change. The myth was planned decades ago. Those who talk about flooding and disappearing cities are hysterical and deluded. Powerful, irresponsible media forces such as the BBC suppress debate about the climate in just the same way that they’ve suppressed debate about covid. The hysteria is so acute that brain-dead protestors in the UK, protected by the police, happily stop ambulances.

People aren’t threatened by climate change or covid. People are threatened by corruption too big for most people to see. They are threatened by self-serving, cowardly, virtue signalling, breast beating doctors whose wilful, staggering ignorance will result in hundreds of thousands of early and unnecessary deaths.

The nonsense from the BMA is pouring out these days.

For example, the BMA now says that Britain needs another 60,000 doctors. Or maybe it’s just England that needs another 60,000. Or Milton Keynes. It’s lunacy.

Britain doesn’t need any more doctors. Dare I suggest that the NHS needs the GPs on the payroll to do what they’re paid for – which is to see patients. The Department of Health in the UK has just reported that the average GP is now working a three day week and earning over £100,000.

Doctors protest that they are overworked and that they are struggling to deal with a continuing crisis. But they’re working three day weeks. It’s no wonder patients are more likely to win the lottery than get an appointment with their doctor.

When I was a GP my personal list of patients varied between 2,000 and 2,500. That was considered pretty normal. We worked nights and weekends and coped quite well.

Today, the medical profession is complicit in the Government’s genocidal attack on the people it is paid to serve.

Here’s an example of the way the Government has deliberately helped kill people.

When, early on in the fake covid-19 pandemic, it was announced that the Government wanted retired doctors to help out while younger doctors hid underneath their desks, I wrote to the General Medical Council to offer my name. I knew covid was the rebranded flu and said so and I wasn’t impressed by the scare stories but I thought that with hospital departments closing and GPs as rare a sight as swallows in December, I could perhaps help a little with sore throats, wonky knees and so on. I thought that with GPs all hiding I could perhaps be useful.

Like thousands of other retired doctors I automatically relinquished my licence to practise when I hung up my stethoscope for the last time. The GMC does not now allow retired GPs to remain licensed – thereby permanently depriving the country of thousands of capable and experienced physicians.

In reply to my note, I received a message from the GMC in which they refused to discuss anything with me because the email address from which I wrote was not the same as the email address which I had half a millennium ago when I was last registered and licensed.

I long ago forgot the email address I had then but it felt good to know that some things don’t change and that the GMC is as bureaucratic and as obstructive as ever. The GMC then told me that they wanted me to have my passport scanned and sent to them by email. We don’t have a working scanner (the last three all died) and anyway there is not a chance in hell of my sending a copy of my passport to anyone by email.

I then discovered that the Government had arbitrarily decided that I am far too old to be of any practical use.

Today, I read that I wasn’t the only one to find the GMC intolerably obstructive. The GMC granted temporary emergency licenses to around 8,200 GPs who had retired or been off the register for other reasons. However, the GMC only gave the temporary licences to GPs who had been off the register for less than five years so I was outside their approved time-scale.

However, the vast majority of the doctors given temporary licences have not done any medical work at all. Red tape and bureaucracy prevented them from doing anything useful.

And many additional retired doctors gave up the quest to be relicensed after finding that they had to provide 21 pieces of evidence, including evidence of Prevent Radicalisation training (whatever that is).

The process for returning to work was described as challenging and impenetrable.

It seems that the Government really didn’t want those extra doctors to be available.

And yet bizarrely, this week the Government claimed the country desperately needs more doctors.

If the Government really wants to increase the number of GPs it should invite retired GPs to emerge from retirement – and perhaps work part-time. (After all, many existing, younger GPs, particularly female ones, only work two or three days a week to reduce their tax liabilities. That not sexist – it’s reality. And that’s part of the reason for the shortage. Older GPs working half a week each would improve the health service considerably.)

But this won’t happen.

The Government, and the NHS, will recruit a few foreign doctors (many of whom won’t speak colloquial English) and that will be it. Those foreign doctors will be paid a fortune.

Retired doctors will remain retired and unwanted.

And it seems to me clear that here is yet more proof that covid has been used as a cover for a programme of genocide.

If the British Government had wanted more doctors it could have easily asked 10,000 to 15,000 fit and able retired GPs to come out of retirement. Most doctors only retired (often in their 50s) because they couldn’t bear the GMC’s hated bureaucratic revalidation programme which requires doctors to spend much of their time filling in yet more forms.

Practising medicine is like riding a bicycle. It wouldn’t take long to get back into the groove. Most doctors asked would have happily complied – to help rescue the NHS from the mess of its own making.

(It is difficult to avoid the thought, by the way, that the GMC’s absurd revalidation programme was deliberately introduced to force older, experienced, independent doctors out of the medical profession – thereby making it easier to destroy the NHS, to kill vast numbers of elderly and sick patients and to push through the covid-19 hoax and the covid jab fraud.)

My only conclusion is that the Government did not want more experienced doctors available before or after the covid fraud.


Maybe the Government realised that older, more experienced doctors, not bound by an NHS contract, without mortgages to pay and without future careers to worry about, might be more likely to question the whole covid hoax. It is noteworthy that most of the few doctors objecting to the fraud have been older and more experienced physicians.

Several thousand doctors screaming about the covid lies and the covid jab fraud wouldn’t fit the plan, would they?

And having thousands of experienced doctors around would have made it difficult for the Government and the NHS to murder thousands of old people in care homes, nursing homes and hospitals.

Young doctors, millennials, are, on the whole, far too naïve and self-serving to question authority. They don’t understand the meaning of cognitive dissonance.

You need to be angry. Be very angry. And share information about the fraud with everyone you know.

It is becoming clear just how ruthless the Government was in ensuring that the genocide went ahead without hindrance. Here’s more evidence proving that the genocide is real.

For example, it is now known that private hospitals in the UK were paid billions of pounds to close their doors to private patients. The story was that they were being closed so that they could help support the overworked NHS during the pandemic.

But the figures show that the NHS was never overworked. Indeed, parts of it – including intensive care wards – were quieter than usual.

In order to ensure that the private health hospitals didn’t interfere with the genocide a total of 7,956 private beds were rented at £400 million a month. Taxpayers had a bill running into billions.

But for 39% of the days paid for, those beds were completely empty.

A total of 187 private hospitals were rented (together with their staff) but they treated an average of just eight covid patients a day. The vast majority of beds remained empty.

This was clearly part of the genocidal plan.

If private hospitals had remained open umpteen thousands of patients would have been able to obtain treatment outside the NHS – or what is left of it. Patients with cancer and heart disease could have been treated.

And thousands of lives would have been saved.

But saving lives wasn’t the Government’s plan.

Daily for eighteen months I have waited for doctors to wake up to reality. I am ashamed of my former profession.

Just remember this: I give you facts which are easily checked. The medical establishment, the advisors and the media doctors hand out opinions and propaganda.

Next there is this.

Yet another official health spokesperson is reported to have said that covid is possibly no more dangerous than flu.

Eighteen months late, but they got there. Which is nice.

And yet for the last 18 months covid has apparently been the sole reason for the existence of hospitals and other parts of the NHS. All other diseases – including cancer and heart disease take second place to covid – the rebranded flu.

Once a patient is diagnosed as having covid – whether they have symptoms or not – they are put on a special covid ward. All decisions about their treatment then revolve around the assumption that they have covid and are a threat to everyone. Other treatments are denied or suspended. The staff have been indoctrinated into believing in the sanctity of the PCR test – proven to be a pointless exercise – in believing that covid can be spread asymptomatically – when the evidence shows this is not true – that masks are vital – when the scientific evidence proves they do more harm than good. Medical staff have, for the first time in history, put themselves and their needs above their patients.

Medical staff have for a year and a half practised militarised, medicine; medicine by numbers. Covid has been all that matters.

And now things are about to get worse.

Doctors and nurses are going to practise a new brand of medicine – defined and downgraded by the global warming pseudoscience.

But maybe we can stop that and bounce some sense into them.

After all, it looks as if we’re winning the battle to save the children. Indeed, it looks as if many children have more sense than adults. The uptake in children for the experimental jab is very poor in the UK and the Government is resorting to threats to try to force children into complying. I don’t think it will work. They thought that by giving 12-year-olds the right to decide, they would jab more. Didn’t work.

Oh, and finally, one more thing:

Readers of my website will know that a week or two ago I challenged Dr Hilary Jones, a British TV doctor and supporter of the covid fraud and the experimental covid jab, to a live TV debate about covid and covid jabs.

You won’t be surprised that there has been no response.

Please make your own chicken sounds.

Original source:

661 People Die After Taking the Vaxxine in Maine

By Covid Global News


Original Source:

Receipts! Patent Proves Vaxx Is Obedience Training Platform

By Newzealand Times


The WHOLE WORLD WILL CHANGE if this interview is seen by the masses. This is it. This is the FINAL “Variant”. Your life, the life of our children and every generation to come will be forever enslaved if this agenda is carried out!

Original Source:

Fully Vaxxinated Are Cov ‘Super-Spreaders,’ Says Inventor of mRNA Technology

By Covid Global News

On the latest episode of “The Hidden Gateway” podcast, Dr. Robert Malone, recognized for his role in inventing mRNA vaccine technology, said, “The idea that if you have a workplace where everybody’s vaccinated, you’re not going to have virus spread is totally false. A total lie.”

On the latest episode of “The Hidden Gateway” podcast, host Justin Williams spoke to Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized medical doctor and scientist who assisted with inventing mRNA vaccines.

The wide-ranging discussion covered:

Malone referenced two instances where citizens are being “enticed” to take what he refers to as the “experimental” vaccine.

“There was a period where West Virginia was trying to get people to get vaccinated,” Malone said. “And so they had a shotgun lottery. And in Canada, there was a policy of offering free ice cream to children to get them to take the jab even without their parents’ approval. So those are just two particularly clear examples of unfair coercion … It’s not actually legal.”

Malone likened what’s going on today with COVID vaccines to the illegal medical experiments conducted by Nazi Germany. “[During the Second World War], Jews and other ethnic groups were subjected to horrible experimental medical research,” Malone said. “And they justified it by saying it was for the common good.”

Malone said the Western World “agreed we weren’t going to do that anymore. Yet, from time to time we seem to forget, and of course, Tuskegee is one example, and frankly, this is another example.”

In an attempt to clear up misinformation coming from the medical establishment, Malone said fully vaccinated individuals can spread COVID. “The idea that if you have a workplace where everybody’s vaccinated, you’re not going to have virus spread is totally false. A total lie,” Malone said.

The vaccinated are actually the “super-spreaders” that everyone was told about in the beginning of the pandemic, Malone argued.

He said:

“If you consider the scientific fact that vaccinated people have less symptoms than the unvaccinated, but can still easily spread disease, consider your fellow vaccinated worker, whose unvaccinated son brought the disease home and gave it to him … He might not have any symptoms … but he’ll definitely be producing the virus. And he’s going to say, hey, I can go to work today. But he’s going to be spreading the virus like crazy.”

Malone also touched on the idea of “the noble lie:”

“If the government isn’t going to disclose to you what the [vaccine] risks are, and they’re not going to disclose to you what’s really going on because they think that you can’t handle the news … this is called the noble lie.”

Malone denounced the “noble lie” as “paternalistic authoritarianism.” He said the idea of governance-by-lying goes back to Plato and Ancient Greek philosophy which argues that it’s  “okay for politicians and people in authority positions to lie to the general public because they have special knowledge and ability to understand things … and the general public can’t cope with that level of information. And so it’s okay to lie to them.”

“I really disagree with this line of thinking,” Malone said. “Yet it has been public policy in the United States and worldwide in public health for a very long time.”

Original Source:

Donate Now to Help Take Back Our World

$1000 Donation Turns Into $4000 of the New Global Currency

Enter email to get USA Tomorrow updates