Fact-Checking the BBC’s ‘Fact Check’ of the Doctor Who Challenged the Health Secretary

By Will Jones | The Daily Sceptic

The BBC has published another of its questionable ‘reality checks‘, this one by the aptly-titled “disinformation reporter” Rachel Schraer. Her target is doctor Steve James, who directly challenged Health Secretary Sajid Javid on the science behind the impending vaccination mandate when Mr. Javid visited the hospital where he works last week. Schraer, whose medical and scientific credentials are unclear, has taken it upon herself to assess Dr. James’s claims in a piece entitled “Fact-checking the doctor who challenged the Health Secretary“, saying the claims are “not exactly what the evidence shows”. However, the evidence she picks for this ‘fact check’ is very selective, and she overlooks several studies that do indeed back up what the brave doctor was saying.

Dr. James told Mr. Javid: “The vaccines are reducing transmission only for about eight weeks with Delta. For Omicron, it’s probably less.”

‘Disinformation reporter’ Schraer responds:

While vaccines remain very good at protecting against becoming severely ill with Covid, the protection they give against catching it and passing it on does wane more quickly.

Dr. James was referring to a study that found a vaccinated person with Covid was just 2% less likely than an unvaccinated person to pass it on, 12 weeks after a second Oxford-AstraZeneca jab – he acknowledges his reference to “eight weeks” was an error.

But the same study found the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which NHS staff are likely to have had, endured better. Vaccinated people had a 25% lower risk of infecting others than unvaccinated people after 12 weeks.

Well, 25% is not very much, and this is not the only study which looks at this, with others finding even smaller effect. A study in the Lancet found no difference in household secondary attack rate depending on whether the index case was vaccinated, and correspondingly no difference in viral load. A study by the U.S. CDC also found no difference in infectiousness and concluded: “Clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons.” UKHSA and others have also found viral load no lower in the vaccinated. These studies are all pre-Omicron, which is likely to be even more able to evade vaccines.

Schraer continues:

And this research alone doesn’t tell the whole story – the vaccines also reduce people’s risk to others by stopping them catching the virus in the first place.

One paper found those vaccinated with Pfizer 85% less likely than the unvaccinated to be infected with Covid after two weeks and 75% less likely after 12 weeks.

Vaccinated people also seem to clear the virus faster and have less of it in their system – reducing their chances of passing it on.

These studies all looked at the Delta variant, first identified in India.

Two vaccine doses appear to be less effective against catching and passing on Omicron infections – although, they are still good at preventing severe illness – but much of the benefit is restored with a third booster jab.

While some studies, particular older ones, have found high effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine against infection, others have found it drops much lower, with one study from Sweden finding “no effectiveness could be detected” after seven months. Against Omicron many studies have found negligible effectiveness after just three months. Furthermore, according to UKHSA data, infection rates in the ‘fully vaccinated’ have been higher than in the unvaccinated for a number of months – implying negligible or negative unadjusted vaccine effectiveness pre-Omicron – with boosters improving the situation but Omicron reversing the trend.

‘Disinformation’ Schraer then moves on to natural immunity.

The second part of Dr. James’s argument was that he had probably had Covid, providing him with some protection without a vaccine.

“I’ve got antibodies,” he said.

“I’ve been working on the Covid [intensive-care unit] since the beginning.”

So-called natural immunity – having immune cells such as antibodies and T-cells in your system that recognise and fight off the virus from an infection rather than a vaccine – can offer effective protection, although it comes with the risk of becoming very ill or developing “long Covid”.

This comment is irrelevant as Dr. James has already recovered from Covid and was not suggesting that others should contract it instead of being vaccinated (though some may conclude their risks from the vaccine outweigh those from the virus, particularly as the vaccine does not prevent contracting the virus).

Schraer continues:

But what the doctor didn’t mention is that, as with his point about vaccines, this protection also wanes and may be ineffective against infection with a different variant.

An Imperial College London study suggests the protection from having had Covid against infection by the Omicron variant, first identified in South Africa, “may be as low as 19%”.

The Imperial study was published on December 17th using early data and, contrary to most other studies, found “no evidence of Omicron having lower severity than Delta”. This suggests it should not be taken as the final word on Omicron and natural immunity. A more recent study puts the protection provided by natural immunity against Omicron infection at 56%, around the same level as is reported for the boosters (and more resilient).

Schraer adds:

The best protection against Covid comes from having an infection and being vaccinated too, several pieces of research have found.

What Schraer doesn’t mention, however, is that the gain from being vaccinated on top of infection is marginal, and needs to be considered in light of the risks of repeated vaccine doses.

To her credit, Schraer then quotes an academic who broadly supports Dr. James’s opposition to vaccine mandates.

Dominic Wilkinson, a Professor of Medical Ethics, at the University of Oxford, says doctors have a clear ethical duty to be vaccinated but sacking someone who is not but can show they have had a recent infection that may provide similar protection may be unjustifiable.

If the vaccines completely blocked transmission, it would be a much simpler question, he says.

But since they are less effective against new variants, it is “no longer as clear”.

Unfortunately, ‘Disinformation’ Schraer then lets herself down and makes mischief for Dr. James by smearing him by association with the “reaction online”.

Another NHS hospital doctor, Dr Meenal Viz, who spends her spare time online correcting misinformation, told BBC News she feared the clip of Dr. James would be seized on by those who wanted to suggest the science for the vaccine in general was not strong enough – despite the huge weight of evidence from hundreds of independent institutions and millions of people that it prevented disease and death.

This fits into a pattern she regularly sees online, where short clips, single statistics or lines from a scientific study taken out of context can “completely blow up” and cause more confusion than straightforward falsehoods.

“On the internet, when things go viral, people tend to cherry-pick what they want,” Dr Viz said, potentially leaving people with the impression an intensive care doctor was doubting the science of the vaccine, rather than the much narrower and more complicated point Dr. James says he was making.

And her fears were not misplaced.

Dr James’s comments were eagerly seized on by those against vaccination, including some promoting false theories such as the virus is a hoax.

BBC News also found it referenced in more extreme encrypted chat groups, including one used to organise removals of sick patients from hospital against doctors’ advice and coordinate the serving of bogus legal writs accusing doctors and teachers of crimes against humanity.

But Dr. James stands by his comments: “If people wish to polarise, they will do that,” he says.

Leaving aside the malicious smearing-by-association with a random WhatsApp group the BBC found somewhere, it has to be asked, who’s more of a threat to the public right now, an obscure group of ineffectual online activists, or the people in Government and their flunkies in the media who wish to fire thousands of hard-working medical staff, at a time of national shortage, based on a false belief that vaccines prevent the spread of COVID-19?

Original Source: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/12/fact-checking-the-bbcs-fact-checking-of-the-doctor-who-challenged-the-health-secretary/

Sweden: Researchers Note Fading Vaxxine Effect As 7 Fully Inoculated People Die in 1 Month

By Anurag Roushan

According to the Swedish Public Health Agency, in the month of September, the country witnessed 7 out of 10 COVID-related deaths who were fully vaccinated.

Researchers in Sweden have noted fading vaccine effect amid huge inoculation rate in the country. This comes after the country witnessed a few COVID-related death who were fully vaccinated. Last month, 7 out of 10 COVID-related deaths in Sweden were fully vaccinated people, according to the Swedish Public Health Agency.

Meanwhile, Farshid Jalalvand, a clinical microbiology researcher at Lund University, stated that there are various reasons why the number of fully vaccinated among the deceased has increased. He said that relaxation in restrictions, as well as, the spread of the Delta variant could be the primary reason. He further stated that the Delta variant of coronavirus is known to spread more easily than the Alpha strain among both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. However, fully vaccinated people “usually have good protection,” reported news agency, Sputnik, citing newspaper Svenska Dagbladet.

According to Gunilla Karlsson Hedestam, a professor of vaccine immunology at the Karolinska Institute, it is not surprising that vaccine protection diminishes over time. She stated that the mRNA vaccines are great since they can be created quickly and significantly lower the risk of serious illness. However, they do not create as many antibodies as protein-based vaccinations. The higher the antibody concentration in the blood after vaccination, the more powerful and long-lasting the protection will be, she claimed. It should be mentioned here that there are currently no protein-based COVID-19 vaccines on the global market, although Novavax and Sanofi Pasteur have submitted applications for approval to the WHO and the European Commission, respectively.

Sweden halts use of Moderna’s COVID vaccine for younger population

Meanwhile, on October 5, Sweden’s health officials halted the use of Moderna’s COVID vaccine for people aged 30 and below. According to Sweden’s Public Health Agency, the decision was taken after an elevated risk of heart inflammation, a rare side effect connected with the shot was noted. The country’s chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, stressed that they will closely monitor the situation and respond quickly to ensure that COVID-19 vaccines are always as safe as possible while still offering excellent disease protection. It should be noted here that Sweden, a country of over 10 million people, has witnessed 1.16 million cases and approximately 15,000 deaths since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Besides, over 65% of the population is fully vaccinated in the country, reported Sputnik.

Original Source: https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/europe/sweden-researchers-note-fading-vaccine-effect-as-7-fully-inoculated-people-die-in-1-month.html

Got It Yet? Stay Away From the Jabbed They Can Kill

By Lioness Yellow Vests Australia

Original Source: https://truthbook.social/post/23561

Five Nurses Speak Out About What Is Really Going On in Hospitals

By Steve Kirsch

The nurses are from America’s Frontline Nurses.

Hear first hand about the death threats, job dismissals, break ins, and shoddy treatment by the local police department. You’ll hear about how in the hospital patients were not fed for 9 days. You’ll learn why if you want to give a patient ivermectin it requires a court order. Is there a hospital where you can get decent care? Yes, they know of one hospital in Utah. Why can’t we create a hospital that puts patients first? Can you negotiate the outrageous hospital bills? (turns out you might be able to but I can’t).

Comments on Rumble include:

Note: Not all 5 are technically nurses. 3 are.

Original Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/five-nurses-speak-out-about-what?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cta

The New Normal? 400 Athletes Collapsing & Dying Just in the Last 6 Months?

By Zach Heilman

While governments all over the world debate COVID-19 and what is the best way to defeat the virus that continues to spread over the globe, there is a terrifying trend taking place in the sports world that nobody appears to be talking about. The same governments that claim to institute mandates and protocols in the name of public health have yet to acknowledge that athletes all over the world have been collapsing on the fields and courts for no apparent reason. And to make it worse, according to a new video, in just the last six months, 400 have not only plummeted to the ground, but apparently, some have even died.

In the video, featured below, the host of Resonant Mind started to notice small stories coming out about perfectly healthy athletes mysteriously dying. Although the host admitted when his research started, there were only around 80 people on that list, as already mentioned above, at the time he uploaded his video, that number had rocketed to 400. And still, with some being hospitalized with seizures and neurological issues, there is little information coming out of the sports world about this terrifying trend.

Original Source: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/01/the-new-normal-400-athletes-collapsing-dying-just-in-the-last-6-months/

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on Graphene Oxide, Parasites, and Transistors Found in Vaxxines

By Orwellito

In an exclusive interview for CONUVIVE Mundial (United Nations World Council for Life and Truth), Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger talked about the findings made by her and several scientists around the world about the content of vaccines, mentioning from graphene oxide to parasites and biotechnology.

Orwell City brings one of the key excerpts from the interview.

Dr. Astrid Stucklberger: Now. So when you know that the graphene oxide is an accelerator and it can go very quickly in the tissue, and then you know that, scientifically, in the autopsy, after death… They have a forbidden autopsy for a long time because they knew that we wouldn’t find the virus. But now the scientists are looking at the… You know, they’re doing autopsies. So what they found is that the Spike protein is not just in one place (where you’re jabbed). They’re everywhere in the body. In the organs, in the tissues, and in all the liquids and the “plumbery.” And this isn’t normal.

And how can it go and be transported? My hypothesis is that it’s graphene oxide. So this means that if the Spike protein is really toxic, graphene oxide is what transports it everywhere. And we don’t know whether the graphene oxide or the Spike protein is the “killer.” Because actually, in the autopsy of sportspeople, even in their brains, what you find is a coagulation of the blood. And it’s so thick that the Spike protein couldn’t do that. So this is very strange. You can measure this micro-coagulation with the D-dimer test. D-dimer test.

OK, so that’s the first point. We can look at Spike protein and graphene oxide as a combination that goes in the whole body and the brain. But I’m not sure that the Spike protein is really the “killer.” But what Professor Bhakti says is that Spike protein triggers an auto-immune reaction. But we have no proof of this because there is no Spike… There’s no virus isolation. So I still have a doubt about this, and that’s just graphene oxide. But now… I’ll talk more about graphene oxide afterward.

But what I want to say is that another group of scientists in Germany, a pathologist, Professor Arne Burckhardt, and Professor Langer have made, together with Reiner Fuellmich —the lawyer— a press conference with an Electronic Microscope. They have taken the vaccine liquid, showed it on the screen, and confirmed the presence of graphene oxide in high doses. They have confirmed the presence of metals that have nothing to do with an experimental vaccine. It’s chrome and nickel. And they have found some type of parasites and, also, a transistor. And they said, “We have to investigate what’s this transistor.”

But when they made this “stage” on what’s in the vaccine, they said in the press conference that anybody… “Now that we have told them what’s in the vaccine… Anybody who’s doing this experimental vaccine and forcing it onto people will be accused on the international trial. Because they’re committing a crime since all those components are toxic for people.”

Working in a research group is like doing detective work. So now, the next group that did the same is Dr. Carrie Madej and Dr. Zalewski, who are… You know, one is an archaeologist. One was working in the laboratory of Pfizer. And then, Dr. Ariana Love. They have also looked into this in a different way. They put the parasite under the microscope at body temperature. And the eggs, because they found nano-eggs, nano… You know, more stuff in there. And they found that this egg at body temperature would become a parasite that would go out. And it’s Hydra Vulgaris.

And this is very, very strange. Very worrying. We have never seen this in any book of medicine. It was said by those experts. So this is another mystery. Then, there’s more in this vaccine than we know. And they have different lots with different… You know, batches with different risks of dying or not. That’s one thing.

Now, I have to come to the last part… The latest danger that we find now… And this is thanks to Professor Campra Madrid. His latest and final report is coming to a really, really interesting point. And it corresponds to what we call in the WHO, a chemical hazard. Because if you have a chemical intoxication or poisoning, it creates an infection. Or creates a heart attack. Or it creates this and that.

So what they found is that, in fact, this graphene has a potential, a power that makes (radiation) a thousand times higher because graphene is an ionizer. There’s an ionization. I’m not an expert, but I remember the concept. There’s an ionization that multiplies radiation 1000 times, which means that they have potentialized graphene. And it’s very sensitive to radiation. And according to the group in Spain, La Quinta Columna and Professor Campra, in fact, people are dying of acute radiation and not about anything else. Acute radiation. And radiation coagulates the blood, and it cannot be transported. And this is why footballers or sportspeople should stop sport if they got the vaccine. Because when they do sport, they accelerate their bodies, and the whole acceleration of radiation becomes so acute that the heart stops and they fall.

And I tell my friends, “You’re infectologists, you’re always talking more about the infectious diseases.” I tell them, “Do you really think that a footballer who drops dead on the football field… Did you think this is a virus? That it’s infectious? It’s not a virus. It’s impossible. You cannot just die from a heart attack because of an infectious disease. It’s a highly intoxicating chemical.”

And we don’t know more, but I’m sure we’re going to find more. So the fact is that we shouldn’t give blood to anybody if we’re vaccinated because there are nanoparticles. And that those nanoparticles are transmitted. They’re “contagious.” It’s the vaccine and the nanoparticles that “fly.” We don’t know yet. But what they’re saying is that, in fact, those nanoparticles can be transmitted like a poison. Because that’s how they want everybody to mix up. We have to be very careful with the vaccinated people because once they have been experimentally vaccinated, they’re transmitting much more (nanoparticles) at the beginning.

So it’s very… We don’t know everything, but we know that the people who are vaccinated are at high risk of having a disease. And also of transmitting it to their partner if they’re sleeping with them. If they even hold hands. I have talked with doctors who told me that even couples that just hold hands. And one is vaccinated, and the other isn’t. The second comes and has a high level of D-dimer and graphene.

So graphene nanoparticles transmit from person to person in a very, very quick way. And it’s very important that people understand that they have to detoxify their blood. We’re going to talk about this now. Detoxify and take away the potentiality of graphene nanoparticles.

Original Source: https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/dr-stuckelberger.html

The British Government Admits That People Who Have Taken 2 Vaxxines Have Had Their Immune Systems Permanently Damaged

By Global News

The British government admits that people who have taken 2 vaccinates have had their immune systems permanently damaged. Thus, they are more easily exposed to infection. And more easily exposed to diseases in general.

It is in official report that is now available and no conspiracy theory. We have not even seen the top of what the iceberg reveals.

The British government has spilled the beans about that fact that once you get double jabbed, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity against Covid variants – or possibly any virus.

So let’s watch the ‘real’ pandemic begin now!

In its Week 42 “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report,” the U.K. Health Security Agency admitted on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” It goes on to explain that this antibody drop is basically permanent.

What’s this mean?
We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).

What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.

In the long term, people who take the vaccine will be far more vulnerable to any mutations in the spike protein that might come along, even if they have already been infected and recovered once, or more than once.

The unvaccinated, meanwhile, will procure lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being infected with it naturally even just once.

Original Source: https://t.me/thought_13/2566

Official UK Government Data for the Past 5 Months Proves Cov-19 Boosters Destroy the Innate Immune System Causing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

By The Expose

An in-depth investigation of 5 months worth of official UK Government data published by the UK Health Security Agency seems to confirm predictions previously made by The Expose that the Covid-19 “booster” dose would provide a very short lived temporary boost to the immune systems of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune systems much more rapidly than had already been seen in people who had received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.

In short, official UK Government data strongly suggests that the Covid-19 vaccinated population are developing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publish a weekly Vaccine Surveillance Report, with each report containing four weeks worth of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status. For our investigation we analysed 5 of these published Vaccine Surveillance Reports containing data from August 16th 2021 to January 2nd 2022, in order to get a clear picture on the effect the Covid-19 vaccines are having on the immune systems of the vaccinated population, and this is what we found…

Real-World Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

Pfizer claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of a simple calculation (full details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of infections confirmed amongst the vaccinated group and the not-vaccinated group during the earliest stages of the still ongoing clinical trials.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and the data unfortunately paints an extremely concerning picture.

The week 37 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 33 and week 36 of 2021 (August 16th to September 12th). Because the report tells us the Covid-19 case rates per 100,000 people among the unvaccinated and two dose vaccinated population we are able to calculate the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period, and it proved to be as follows –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-47% in the 60-69 age group, and as high as +66% in the under 18 age group between August 16th and September 12th 2021. The only other age groups that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point were 18-29, 30-39, and 80+. But as you can clearly see none of the age groups were showing a vaccine effectiveness anywhere near 95%.

However, just look at how the tables turn just one month later.

The week 41 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 37 and week 40 of 2021 (September 13th to October 10th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-109% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +89% in the under 18 age group between September 13th and October 10th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point was 18-29.

What’s concerning here though is how far the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine has fallen in all age groups, but especially the 40-49 age group which fell from a real world of effectiveness of minus-36% to minus-109%.

The fact that the real-world effectiveness of the vaccines had surpassed the minus-100% barrier in suggested that not only were the vaccines failing, but they were also completely decimating the immune system of the recipients.

This makes the next Vaccine Surveillance report frightening reading.

The week 45 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 (October 11th to November 7th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows – –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-126% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +78% in the under 18 age group between October 11th to November 7th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point was again 18-29.

What’s concerning here is that two more age-groups have surpassed the minus-100% barrier, with the 50-59 age group falling to minus-116% and the 60-69 age group falling to minus-120%. But what is perhaps more concerning is that the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections has continued to decline in the 40-49 age group after already surpassing the minus-100% barrier in the previous month.

What we can also see from the above is that the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injection in persons over the age of 80 has climbed from minus-22% to minus-9 percent. This coincides with the booster jab roll-out to this age group, suggesting the vaccines do in fact boost the immune system But it is worth noting that there is still a negative effectiveness in this age group, and it still lower than the minus-3% effectiveness seen between week 33 and week 36 of 2021.

The week 49 Vaccine Surveillance report however, provides a much clearer picture on the effect of the boosters on the vaccinated population in the short term.

The week 49 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 45 and week 48 of 2021 (November 8th to December 5th), and the and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows –

The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-120% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +80% in the under 18 age group between November 8th to December 5th 2021. The real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections actually only decreased in the 18-29-year-olds and 30-39-year-olds during these four weeks.

People over the age of 70 were rewarded with a major boost to their immune systems over these four weeks, with vaccine effectiveness proving to be +27% in 70-79-year-olds between 8th Nov and 5th Dec 21, compared to minus-84% between 11th Oct and 7th Nov 21.

Whilst vaccine effectiveness in people over the age of 80 increased to +47% between 8th Nov and 5th Dec 21, compared to minus-9% between 11th Oct and 7th Nov 21.

Everyone between the age of 40 and 69 was also rewarded with a boost to their immune system during this period, however not enough to show a positive vaccine effectiveness. This boost in vaccine effectiveness coincides with when the booster shots were administered to each age group as can be seen in the below graph taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 1 – 2022.

Based on vaccine effectiveness turning positive in everyone over the age of 70 following the booster shot after previously showing a negative effectiveness, we should expect to see a much improved vaccine effectiveness in 40-69-year-olds in the next published Vaccine Surveillance Report.

But unfortunately this isn’t the case.

The week 1 – 2022- Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 49 and week 52 of 2021 (December 6th to January 2nd), and the and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period proved to be as follows –

Real-world vaccine effectiveness dropped to the lowest levels yet across all age groups except for the over 70’s between December 6th and January 2nd, but the over 70’s still dropped into negative effectiveness.

The expected further boost to 40 to 69-year-olds did not materialise and instead a huge tumble in vaccine effectiveness was recorded, dropping to -151% in 40-49-yer-olds.

Vaccine effectiveness also tumbled in the 30-39-year-old age group to minus-123%, despite the booster jab being administered to millions in week 49.

The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in vaccine effectiveness by the month among each age group over a period of 5 months from 16th Aug 21 to 2nd Jan 22.

The first booster shots were administered in week 37 of 2021, and this graph illustrates clearly how they provided a boost in vaccine effectiveness in the following two months. But unfortunately it also shows how short lived this boost was with the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between week 49 and 52.

But what does a positive / negative vaccine effectiveness actually mean?

Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack and provoking the immune system into responding as if you have had the virus. They are supposed to train the immune system to the point where you develop natural immunity to the virus. Therefore, vaccine effectiveness is really a measure of the immune system performance induced by the vaccine.

A vaccine effectiveness of +50% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is 50% better at tackling Covid-19.

A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 0% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, meaning the vaccines are ineffective. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is equal to that of the unvaccinated at tackling Covid-19.

Whilst a vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that the unvaccinated were 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the fully vaccinated, meaning the vaccines actually decimate the immune system.

Therefore with the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines proving to be negative in everyone over the age of 18 in England, this means double/triple vaccinated adults immune systems are being decimated.

Immune System Performance

The formula used to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines was based on the exact calculation used by Pfizer to demonstrate that their vaccine had an alleged effectiveness of 95%.

  • U = No. of Cases among the unvaccinated  
  • V = No. of Cases among the fully vaccinated
  • U – V / U = Vaccine Effectiveness

However in order to calculate the immune system performance we need to perform a slightly different calculation that divides the answer to U – V by the largest of the number of cases among either the unvaccinated or fully vaccinated.

Therefore, the calculation for a positive immune system performance is –

U – V / U

Whilst the calculation for a negative immune system performance is –

U – V / V

The following table shows the monthly boost/decline in the immune systems of the vaccinated population compared to the natural immune systems of the unvaccinated population-

This shows that as of the 2nd January 2021 (Month 5), triple/double vaccinated 40-49-year-olds currently have the worst immune system performance at -60%. But they are closely followed by 30-39-year-olds at -58%, 18-29-year-olds and 50-59-year-olds at -55%, and 60-69-year-olds at -47%.

The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –

What we can see from the above is that the immune system performance for adults aged between 18 and 59 has deteriorated to the worst levels yet since they were given the Covid-19 vaccine. Whilst the immune system performance of everyone over the age of 60 has deteriorated dramatically following receipt of the booster shot, but not yet to the level seen between week 37 and week 40.

The over 70’s have however seen the most dramatic fall in immune system performance between month 4 and month 5 alongside 18-29-year-olds.

The 55% boost to the immune systems of the over 80’s given by the boosters between month 3 and month 4 has all but deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is performing 1% better than it was in month 3 but still 54% worse than their unvaccinated counterparts.

The 73% boost to the immune systems of the 70-79-year-olds given by the boosters between month 3 and month 4 has also all but deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is performing 10% better than it was in month 3 but still 63% worse than their unvaccinated counterparts.

The minor boost however, given to the immune Systems of everyone between the age of 30 and 59 by the boosters between month 3 and 4 has been completely decimated by the following month, whilst 18-29-year-olds have seen a 60% decline in their immune system performance between months 4 and 5.

The following graph illustrates the boost/degradation in immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –

Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

The real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections wains significantly in a short amount of time, but unfortunately for the vaccinated population, rather than the immune system returning to the same state it was prior to vaccination, the immune system performance begins to rapidly decline making it inferior to that of the unvaccinated.

Now the official UK Government data proves that a booster dose of the vaccine can give a short term boost to the immune system of the vaccinated, but unfortunately this same data shows that the immune system performance then begins to decline even faster than it was prior to the booster dose being given.

This data therefore suggests that the vaccinated population will now require an endless cycle of booster shots to boost their immune systems to a point where it does not fail but is inferior to that of the unvaccinated population.

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is a condition that leads to the loss of immune cells and leaves individuals susceptible to other infections and the development of certain types of cancers. In other words, it completely decimates the immune system.

Therefore, could we be seeing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome?

Only time will tell, but judging by the current figures it looks like we will only need to wait a matter of weeks to find out.

Original Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/13/covid-boosters-destroy-immune-system-causing-ade/

The Real Anthony Fauci – Catherine Austin Fitts Talks With Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.


Here’s what others had to say:

All these experts need understudies if they get disappeared we need to ensure the safety and value of their knowledge!

Kennedy is a shill. Prove isolation of covid 19 in a human, fraud! Their all following the Nazi Rockefeller playbook like good little elites families do.

Original Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/sUkQFB0qcd8c/

Donate Now to Help Take Back Our World

$1000 Donation Turns Into $4000 of the New Global Currency

Enter email to get USA Tomorrow updates